<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
  <title>Markus&#039; Blog - google tag</title>
  <link>http://www.tower-net.de:80/blog/tags/google/</link>
  <description>Frenzied programming..., tech..., climbing..., sports..., mountain..., nature... and futile notes</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <copyright>Markus Kolb</copyright>
  <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 18:43:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  <generator>Pebble (http://pebble.sourceforge.net)</generator>
  <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
  
  
  
  
  <item>
    <title>JCP Election Google vs. Oracle (Hologic)</title>
    <link>http://www.tower-net.de:80/blog/2010/11/02/1288735860000.html</link>
    
      
        <description>
          The results of the JCP election arrived and I&#039;m astonished about all the blogs commenting this...&lt;br /&gt;
Many articles have the tenor that it&#039;s fine that Google is in and &lt;a href=&#034;http://www.hologic.com/&#034;&gt;Hologic&lt;/a&gt; hasn&#039;t got enough votes.&lt;br /&gt;
For explanation... I haven&#039;t read about Hologic before and I&#039;m left wondering if Hologic would be beneficial for the JCP.&lt;br /&gt;
But why there is the opinion that Hologic shouldn&#039;t have been voted because ...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Hologic prefers Oracle products&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Oracle has nominated Hologic&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
... is this an acceptable attitude?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the next sentence Google will be mentioned and that this would be the better choice?&lt;br /&gt;
Come on, this election has only brought Google closer to a monopoly. &lt;br /&gt;
What is the benefit of Google for the JCP?&lt;br /&gt;
Google employees create great products. In the Java field the most known  are GWT, GAE, Closure, Google Collections, support libs for all the  Google APIs and also Android and &lt;a href=&#034;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dalvik_%28software%29&#034;&gt;Dalvik&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, Android... I&#039;m not happy that Google has used technology of Android, Inc (see &lt;a href=&#034;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Android_%28operating_system%29&#034;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&#034;http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/aug2005/tc20050817_0949_tc024.htm&#034;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;) for their mobile phone environment. This brought some kind of split into the Java hemisphere.&lt;br /&gt;
I would be thankful if Google uses its new seat to reconcile Android with Java but is this the intention of Google? &lt;br /&gt;
At the moment I&#039;ve a queasy feeling and I&#039;m not convinced that Google can appease my hunger.&lt;br /&gt;
Enjoy your meal!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some more links:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&#034;http://java.dzone.com/articles/jcp-election-results-hologic&#034;&gt;http://java.dzone.com/articles/jcp-election-results-hologic&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&#034;http://www.theserverside.com/news/2240024154/The-Oracle-Lawsuit-Will-End-with-Google-Owning-Java&#034;&gt;http://www.theserverside.com/news/2240024154/The-Oracle-Lawsuit-Will-End-with-Google-Owning-Java&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&#034;http://source.android.com/index.html&#034;&gt;http://source.android.com/index.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&#034;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Android_%28operating_system%29&#034;&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Android_%28operating_system%29&lt;/a&gt;
        </description>
      
      
    
    
    
    <category>tech</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.tower-net.de:80/blog/2010/11/02/1288735860000.html#comments</comments>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tower-net.de:80/blog/2010/11/02/1288735860000.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 22:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <title>Google waved...</title>
    <link>http://www.tower-net.de:80/blog/2009/11/08/1257673320000.html</link>
    
      
        <description>
          This morning I&#039;ve got an invitation to Google Wave.&lt;br /&gt;
I have not tried to communicate through waves right now.&lt;br /&gt;
Had only a fast view of public waves. This is some kind of open discussion with images and videos possible. The public waves are big and so the JavaScript seems to be some performance limitation. Public waves have been slow.
        </description>
      
      
    
    
    
    <category>tech</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.tower-net.de:80/blog/2009/11/08/1257673320000.html#comments</comments>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tower-net.de:80/blog/2009/11/08/1257673320000.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 09:42:00 GMT</pubDate>
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <title>Use Gson to convert between JSON and Java objects</title>
    <link>http://www.tower-net.de:80/blog/2009/10/18/1255825680000.html</link>
    
      
        <description>
          It is really a simple and fast solution to use &lt;a href=&#034;http://code.google.com/p/google-gson/&#034;&gt;google-gson&lt;/a&gt; to convert Java objects with primitives to &lt;a href=&#034;http://www.json.org/&#034;&gt;JSON&lt;/a&gt; and back. &lt;br /&gt;
A call to &lt;em&gt;new Gson().toJson(primitiveObj)&lt;/em&gt; is all you need.&lt;br /&gt;
There&#039;s also a Maven repository for easy integration in your project.&lt;br /&gt;
Try it out before you fiddle around with your own object converter!
        </description>
      
      
    
    
    
    <category>programming</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.tower-net.de:80/blog/2009/10/18/1255825680000.html#comments</comments>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tower-net.de:80/blog/2009/10/18/1255825680000.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 00:28:00 GMT</pubDate>
  </item>
  
  </channel>
</rss>

